UltaHost vs Servarica: Which Is Better?
We track UltaHost and Servarica prices, uptime and specs 24/7. Here's the live head-to-head for September 2026 — no paid rankings, just the data.
About UltaHostUltaHost is a US-incorporated hosting provider (UltaHost, Inc, Delaware) founded in 2018, with 27+ data centers across six continents. It covers the whole range from cheap shared hosting to 64-core bare metal — and, unusually for the budget segment, its VPS and VDS plans are fully managed by default. The business model is classic budget hosting: aggressive 24-month promo rates, 24/7 live chat, and a strong focus on WordPress, reseller and game-server audiences.
About ServaricaServarica is a Canadian-owned and operated hosting provider founded in 2010. It started as an internal hosting project and grew into a full provider with its own routers, ASN and multi-carrier network out of a single Montreal data center. The catalog spans KVM VPS with dedicated cores, NVMe and RAIDz2 storage VPS with daily-expanding disks, dedicated servers from compact EPYC boxes to 192 TB storage giants, a Tesla P40 GPU VPS, and shared hosting with 2 TB plans. All plans sit behind a 99.99% network SLA with cash refunds, and the facility runs on 100% hydroelectric power.
Comparison Table
| Feature | UltaHost | Servarica |
|---|---|---|
| Price / mo | $0.00 win | $1.33 |
| Renewal price | Promo (first term) | Same price (no intro deals) |
| Datacenters | 27 win | 1 |
| NVMe storage | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Free domain | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Backups | — | Weekly (shared only) |
| CDN | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Support | 24/7 live chat & ticket | Ticket & email 24/7 |
| Uptime · 30d | 99.19% win | 98.98% |
Price History
UltaHost · UltaMail FreeCollecting price history — the trend fills in as we track this plan.
Servarica · SSD StarterCollecting price history — the trend fills in as we track this plan.
Uptime & Performance
UltaHost 99.19% Servarica 98.98%Pros & Cons
UltaHost- 43 plans tracked: from free UltaMail to a 64-core dual EPYC 9454 at $1,599.99
- 30-day money-back on Shared, VPS, WordPress, Windows and Reseller (monthly & annual plans)
- Unlimited bandwidth on shared, VPS, VDS, reseller and dedicated plans
- 24/7 live chat and ticket support with a public knowledge base
- 27+ data centers across North & South America, Europe, Africa, Asia and Oceania
- Headline prices require a 24-month prepayment — renewal rates are higher
- Biennial & triennial plans are excluded from the money-back guarantee
- No ISO/SOC compliance certifications published
- Entry dedicated servers use older hardware (DDR3, 300 Mbit/s ports)
Servarica- Genuine budget pricing — KVM VPS from $5/mo with dedicated cores
- Unmetered bandwidth on most plans (250 Mbps, growing +1 Mbps/day)
- Huge storage options — up to 8 TB RAIDz2 VPS and 24× 8 TB dedicated
- 100% Canadian-owned, single Montreal DC outside US data law
- Tiered SLA: 99.0%+ = 15% refund, up to 100% below 95% uptime
- Dedicated IPMI console included on all dedicated servers
- Single data center — no redundancy across regions
- Ticket/email support only — no live chat or phone
- No DDoS protection advertised on any plan
- Older dedicated hardware on budget tiers (Xeon E5 v2/v4, DDR3)
- Fraud screening can delay new orders by hours
- No money-back guarantee — refunds only via the SLA
The Verdict
On the data we track, UltaHost wins more rows in the comparison table above (3 vs 0). That said, the right pick depends on which rows matter most for your use case — price, uptime, datacenters or backups.
UltaHost & Servarica alternatives
Cheaper than UltaHost / Servarica
FAQ
Right now UltaHost has the lower entry price across the plans we track. Prices update every few hours — the live snapshot above always shows the current starting price for both.
Over the last 30 days of our monitoring, UltaHost had the higher measured uptime. We ping both providers every few minutes from multiple locations — see the uptime graph above.
Yes. Both run standard KVM virtualization, so you can snapshot your server, export the image, and import it on the other provider. For most stacks a fresh deploy plus a data copy is simpler.
It depends on your priority: pick the one that wins on the rows that matter most to you in the table above (price, uptime, datacenters, backups). For latency-sensitive apps favour uptime and network; for value favour price and specs.