NovoServe vs Servarica: Which Is Better?
We track NovoServe and Servarica prices, uptime and specs 24/7. Here's the live head-to-head for September 2026 — no paid rankings, just the data.
About NovoServeNovoServe is a Dutch bare-metal hosting provider (est. 2013) with 7,000+ servers across its own Tier III data centers in the Netherlands, Denmark and the United States. Headquartered in Enschede, it operates an 18Tbps carrier-neutral network with 800+ peering partners and sells dedicated servers, GPU servers, storage and unmetered bandwidth lines plus colocation — aimed at MSPs, SaaS, streaming, iGaming, fintech and AI workloads.
About ServaricaServarica is a Canadian-owned and operated hosting provider founded in 2010. It started as an internal hosting project and grew into a full provider with its own routers, ASN and multi-carrier network out of a single Montreal data center. The catalog spans KVM VPS with dedicated cores, NVMe and RAIDz2 storage VPS with daily-expanding disks, dedicated servers from compact EPYC boxes to 192 TB storage giants, a Tesla P40 GPU VPS, and shared hosting with 2 TB plans. All plans sit behind a 99.99% network SLA with cash refunds, and the facility runs on 100% hydroelectric power.
Comparison Table
| Feature | NovoServe | Servarica |
|---|---|---|
| Price / mo | $68.44 | $1.33 win |
| Renewal price | Monthly (promos ex. VAT) | Same price (no intro deals) |
| Datacenters | 5 win | 1 |
| NVMe storage | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Free domain | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Backups | — | Weekly (shared only) |
| CDN | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Support | — | Ticket & email 24/7 |
| Uptime · 30d | 99.32% win | 99.01% |
Price History
NovoServe · Unmetered 1Gbps Entry ServerCollecting price history — the trend fills in as we track this plan.
Servarica · SSD StarterCollecting price history — the trend fills in as we track this plan.
Uptime & Performance
NovoServe 99.32% Servarica 99.01%Pros & Cons
NovoServe- Own 18Tbps carrier-neutral backbone with 800+ peering partners
- 5 Tier III data centers: Amsterdam (×2), Rotterdam/The Hague, Copenhagen, New York
- Entry dedicated servers from €59/mo with 25TB traffic included by default
- Unmetered bandwidth lines on 1G, 2G, 5G, 10G and up to 50Gbps dedicated ports
- GPU fleet: NVIDIA V100 / RTX 3090, AMD MI50 / MI210, up to 4× RTX PRO 6000 96GB
- In-house anti-DDoS scrubbing centers on every server
- Most stock servers run older generations (HPE G8/Gen9, Xeon E5/v2)
- Custom builds, HPC and colocation are quote-only — no public price list
- Bare metal only — no shared hosting, VPS or managed services
- Published prices are ex. VAT (21% Dutch VAT for EU consumers)
- No money-back guarantee on dedicated servers
- Only EU + US East Coast locations — nothing in Asia
Servarica- Genuine budget pricing — KVM VPS from $5/mo with dedicated cores
- Unmetered bandwidth on most plans (250 Mbps, growing +1 Mbps/day)
- Huge storage options — up to 8 TB RAIDz2 VPS and 24× 8 TB dedicated
- 100% Canadian-owned, single Montreal DC outside US data law
- Tiered SLA: 99.0%+ = 15% refund, up to 100% below 95% uptime
- Dedicated IPMI console included on all dedicated servers
- Single data center — no redundancy across regions
- Ticket/email support only — no live chat or phone
- No DDoS protection advertised on any plan
- Older dedicated hardware on budget tiers (Xeon E5 v2/v4, DDR3)
- Fraud screening can delay new orders by hours
- No money-back guarantee — refunds only via the SLA
The Verdict
On the data we track, NovoServe wins more rows in the comparison table above (2 vs 1). That said, the right pick depends on which rows matter most for your use case — price, uptime, datacenters or backups.
NovoServe & Servarica alternatives
Cheaper than NovoServe / Servarica
FAQ
Right now Servarica has the lower entry price across the plans we track. Prices update every few hours — the live snapshot above always shows the current starting price for both.
Over the last 30 days of our monitoring, NovoServe had the higher measured uptime. We ping both providers every few minutes from multiple locations — see the uptime graph above.
Yes. Both run standard KVM virtualization, so you can snapshot your server, export the image, and import it on the other provider. For most stacks a fresh deploy plus a data copy is simpler.
It depends on your priority: pick the one that wins on the rows that matter most to you in the table above (price, uptime, datacenters, backups). For latency-sensitive apps favour uptime and network; for value favour price and specs.