3HCloud vs Timeweb: Which Is Better?
We track 3HCloud and Timeweb prices, uptime and specs 24/7. Here's the live head-to-head for October 2026 — no paid rankings, just the data.
About 3HCloud3HCloud is a US-registered provider (3HCLOUD LLC, Hollywood, Florida) that launched in 2020 and runs OpenStack-based cloud servers from five locations: Miami, Dallas, San Francisco, Warsaw and Manila.
The catalogue is a single published price list: four instance families (shared vCPU, plus dedicated-vCPU general-purpose, CPU-optimized and memory-optimized), block storage sold separately by IOPS class, network load balancers and elastic bandwidth. Dedicated servers and colocation are quote-only through sales.
About TimewebTimeweb Cloud (est. 2006, St. Petersburg) is one of Russia's largest hosting providers, with 14 data centers across Russia, Europe, Central Asia and the US. The catalog spans shared hosting from 180 ₽/mo, a premium 1C-Bitrix line with isolated resources, 160+ ready dedicated server configs, NVMe VDS with daily billing, 352 domain zones, SSL certificates, business email and a website builder — plus a 10-day free trial, free site migration and daily backups on every hosting plan.
Comparison Table
| Feature | 3HCloud | Timeweb |
|---|---|---|
| Price / mo | $1.50 win | $3.82 |
| Renewal price | Same as initial | 3-year promos vs monthly |
| Datacenters | 5 | 14 win |
| NVMe storage | ✗ No | ✓ Yes win |
| Free domain | ✗ No | ✓ Yes win |
| Backups | Paid | — |
| CDN | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| Support | — | 24/7 Chat & Phone (RU) |
| Uptime · 30d | 99.93% win | 99.82% |
Price History
3HCloud · 1 GB 1 vCPU Shared PoolCollecting price history — the trend fills in as we track this plan.
Timeweb · YearUptime & Performance
3HCloud 99.93% Timeweb 99.82%Pros & Cons
3HCloud- Full public price list - every instance, hourly and monthly, on one page
- Hourly billing on every plan, not just the entry tier
- Dedicated-vCPU families for CPU-bound and memory-bound workloads
- 1 Gbit/s per instance with no traffic volume cap
- OpenStack API, Terraform and SSH-key access
- Five regions across the US, EU and APAC
- Storage is not included - disks are billed separately from $0.01/GB per month
- A public IPv4 address costs $1/month on top of the plan price
- Windows images add $3 per core per month and need at least 2 vCPUs
- No refunds - SLA downtime is repaid in service credits only
- No published ISO/SOC certifications
- Dedicated servers are quote-only, not self-serve
Timeweb- Shared hosting from 180 ₽/mo with unlimited traffic and daily backups
- 10-day free trial + free site migration + free .RU/.РФ domain on yearly plans
- Premium line with isolated resources for 1C-Bitrix (1Сайт / Eterno / Premium)
- 160+ ready dedicated configs from 7,270 ₽/mo across 10 data centers
- NVMe VDS from 711 ₽/mo with daily billing and a 1 Gbps port
- Free Let's Encrypt SSL, free DNS hosting and email on every plan
- Best promos require a 3-year commitment (monthly rates are 2-3× higher)
- Support and documentation are Russian-first; English site is limited
- No money-back guarantee — a 10-day trial instead
- Only 2 dedicated GPU configs (Tesla T4 / A2)
- International data centers cover a small slice of the catalog
- Hourly cloud billing lives on a separate Timeweb Cloud platform
The Verdict
On the data we track, Timeweb wins more rows in the comparison table above (3 vs 2). That said, the right pick depends on which rows matter most for your use case — price, uptime, datacenters or backups.
3HCloud & Timeweb alternatives
Cheaper than 3HCloud / Timeweb
FAQ
Right now 3HCloud has the lower entry price across the plans we track. Prices update every few hours — the live snapshot above always shows the current starting price for both.
Over the last 30 days of our monitoring, 3HCloud had the higher measured uptime. We ping both providers every few minutes from multiple locations — see the uptime graph above.
Yes. Both run standard KVM virtualization, so you can snapshot your server, export the image, and import it on the other provider. For most stacks a fresh deploy plus a data copy is simpler.
It depends on your priority: pick the one that wins on the rows that matter most to you in the table above (price, uptime, datacenters, backups). For latency-sensitive apps favour uptime and network; for value favour price and specs.